.

Thursday, March 21, 2019

Karl Marx’s Views on Family Ethics Essay -- Karl Marx Communist Manife

Karl Marxs Views on Family moral philosophy Karl Marx and Frederick Engels Karl Marx devoted much of his time to the adopt of morality, better known as ethics. Karl Marx was a firm believer in Communism and he authored the communist Manifesto, along with Frederick Engels. Family ethics is an issue dealt with by Karl Marx in his teachings and writings. According to Marx and his co-author, Engels, morality is the slave of interest. Moral codes and ethics ar believed to be dependent on the person and relative to the social setting.1 Ethics be discussed on a philosophical level and also in everyday controversial topic discussions or debates. Marx was a huge champion of freedom and believed that freedom was a result of the Communist party and its beliefs. Karl Marx had particular faith in the future of Capitalism and the system of Monarchy, and he believed that erstwhile these two ideas of politics were eliminated, Communism would move in and re place the do by thoughts instilled with Capitalism and Monarchy, and provide the orbit with sense and reason. Stating his feelings clearly in the Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx noted that the selling point in the miserliness should be the mass themselves, not the working labor, money, or rent from the property.2 To supplement these theories, Marx proposes an end to the caper of men and their activities, which is to direct mens attention on the economy so that there could be prevailing freedom. thither are whatever discrepancies in Marxs theories, like the question of what else has an impact on freedom. There are other issues, but the issue remains that people are unaware if freedom ethics applies to every(prenominal) people and how it affects the modern society. ... ...roposal for the world and Communism was too far-fetched and would not work. Every time there has been a push towards Communism, it has always failed. There have been several unsuccessful attempts, all ending in a problematic dictatorship. While he did body forth freedom was a major issue, he lacked in knowledge that family sustenance was also significant. Notes1 Kamenka, Eugene. Marxism and Ethics. New York W.D. Hudson, 1969 - Pg. 4. 2 Kamenka, Eugene. Pg. 13. 3 Heyer, Paul. Nature, Human Nature, and Society. Greenwood Press, 1982 Pg.126. 4 Heyer, Paul. Pg. 125. 5 Heyer, Paul. Pg. 127 6 Kamenka, Eugene. Pg. 26. 7 Kamenka, Eugene. Pg. 49. 8 Kamenka, Eugene. Pg. 51. 9 Koren, Henry. Marx and the Authentic Man. Pittsburgh, PA, 1967 Pg. 33. 10 Koren, Henry. Pg. 67. 11 Koren, Henry. Pg. 68.

No comments:

Post a Comment